2010-07-20 23:45:00.000 – Mike Carmon,  Staff Meteorologist

Oops! Bust!

Another shift is winding to a close, and I’ve become a bit jaded with this temperamental rock pile this Observatory sits atop. This, by far, has been the most challenging week of forecasting since I began working here nearly two years ago.

It was bad enough to forecast clearing that never happened, or thick fog that suddenly lifted. I’ve become accustomed to unpredictable and inexplicable fog in my tenure here. However, Tuesday brought a failure that I personally consider to be one of the worst in the world of meteorology. I made no mention of any kind of precipitation in the forecast for Tuesday. Imagine my dismay and utter astonishment when I awoke to discover a radar picture littered with thunderstorms.

After a bit of venting and grumbling, I pondered the reason for this unfortunate turn of weather events.

‘The models!’ I exclaimed.

Computer models are a lifeline to any forecaster, but should always be supplemented with a forecaster’s experience with local climatic tendencies and big picture (or ‘synoptic’) situations in general. In other words, they should always be taken with a bit of a grain of salt. I’ve been guilty in the past of relying too heavily on what the computer models have to say, and this time, it proved to be a costly error. However, when no model hints at even the slightest chance of thunderstorms, and the maps show high pressure building in, I would have never thought to mention the risk in the forecast.

So…what happened? Well, the high pressure center predicted to build in, which was expected to be weak to begin with, was even less impressive than the models foretold. In the meantime, a disturbance at the mid-levels of the atmosphere charged southward, and took advantage of the extra instability that was present because of the feeble high pressure system. Under a different air mass regime, drier conditions, or the lack of a ripple in the mid-level flow, the overestimation of the high by the models would not have yielded such a busted forecast. However, the combination of these scenarios led to the generation of thunderstorms charging southward through northern New Hampshire.

Of course, I find all of this complaining bittersweet, because as a self-proclaimed weather nerd, I thoroughly enjoy thunderstorms. Also, this does make four consecutive days of thunder gracing the summit. And in the end, this failure and evaluation of my busted forecast can only help to make me a better forecaster in the future. Heck, I feel like I’m in college again, writing essays well into the night explaining why a forecast I made went so wrong.

Education never ceases!


Mike Carmon,  Staff Meteorologist

Overview of Lapse Rate Research

May 20th, 2024|0 Comments

Overview of Lapse Rate Research By Karl Philippoff As a weather observer and research specialist on top of Mount Washington, in addition to my usual observer duties such as taking hourly observations, releasing forecasts,

Deadline Driven: The 12-Hour Shifts that Power Weather Forecasting from the Northeast’s Highest Peak

May 9th, 2024|Comments Off on Deadline Driven: The 12-Hour Shifts that Power Weather Forecasting from the Northeast’s Highest Peak

Deadline Driven: The 12-Hour Shifts that Power Weather Forecasting from the Northeast's Highest Peak By Wendy Almeida  As a new member of the Mount Washington Observatory team, I wanted to gain a deeper understanding

Find Older Posts